Hi,
Just wondering, would any fix(es) in the new Frams version enable me to use
this?:
/*0*/
p:0,x=0,y=4,z=0.3
p:1,x=4,y=0,z=0.3
p:2,x=0,y=-4,z=0.3
p:3,x=-4,y=0,z=0.3
p:4,x=0,y=4.5,z=0,fr=1
p:5,x=0.5,y=3.5,z=0,fr=1
p:6,x=-0.6,y=3.5,z=0,fr=1
p:7,x=4.5,y=0,z=0,fr=1
p:8,x=3.5,y=-0.5,z=0,fr=1
p:9,x=3.5,y=0.5,z=0,fr=1
p:10,x=0,y=-4.5,z=0,fr=1
p:11,x=-0.5,y=-3.5,z=0,fr=1
p:12,x=0.5,y=-3.5,z=0,fr=1
p:13,x=-4.5,y=0,z=0,fr=1
p:14,x=-3.5,y=0.5,z=0,fr=1
p:15,x=-3.5,y=-0.5,z=0,fr=1
p:16,x=1,y=1,z=3
p:17,x=1,y=-1,z=3
p:18,x=-1,y=-1,z=3
p:19,x=-1,y=1,z=3
p:20,x=0,y=0,z=2.5
p:21,x=0,y=0,z=4
j:0,4
j:0,5
j:0,6
j:4,5
j:5,6
j:6,4
j:1,7
j:1,8
j:1,9
j:7,8
j:8,9
j:9,7
j:2,10
j:2,11
j:2,12
j:10,11
j:11,12
j:12,10
j:3,13
j:3,14
j:3,15
j:13,14
j:14,15
j:15,13
j:0,16
j:16,1
j:1,17
j:17,2
j:2,18
j:18,3
j:3,19
j:19,0
j:16,17
j:17,18
j:18,19
j:19,16
j:16,20
j:17,20
j:18,20
j:19,20
j:20,21
... it seems OK, until it hits the ground :/
Thanks,
Kieren Johnstone
Re: Frams 2
Dear Kieren,
> Just wondering, would any fix(es) in the new Frams version enable me to use
> this?:
>
> /*0*/
> p:0,x=0,y=4,z=0.3
> p:1,x=4,y=0,z=0.3
> p:2,x=0,y=-4,z=0.3
> ...
I have just checked this one.
One of the validation constraints required for simulation
stability is that the max joint length is 2.
Best,
MacKo